Age of wushu pc gameplay12/8/2023 SOLO is made with the mobile games principle in mind - the target audience is people with low IQ, little imagination and very short attention span who require instant gratification and fireworks and fanfares when they press WASD. The problem is that the story in the game is really bad so even though the game is very story-heavy, it feels awful.īoth games may look a lot a like, but they are very different and from different periods where different MMORPG philosophy was dominant.ĪoW was meant to give players flexibility and freedom so they can use their imagination to create their own adventure that is not limited by quests - once you complete all the quests in the game, the story ends. No, you can only take one quest, it's probably very dumbed-down and simplistic and it leads to the next one. You can't really go into a quest hub, take about 6-7 quests and then choose in what order you want to do them in. Even if you read everything and try to pay attention to the story, the game is still boring and feels very limited. After you waste 5 minutes of your life reading boring dialogue, you have to kill 3 mobs and then you're back to wasting 5 minutes with dialogue. SOLO is just like a mobile MMO - you have no freedom and everything is on rails - you have to watch drawn-out boring cutscenes, then spend 5 minutes reading some boring NPC dialogue that's separated sentence-by-sentence instead of having a quest window with the quest text neatly structured in paragraphs for easy reading. You had mini games like Weiqi, you had Sect Wars, you could train in large groups, there were so many different ways to play the game. In AoW you had a short introductory quest line and after that you were free to play the game as you please. SOLO is like a mobile MMORPG that is only lacking the Auto-Play button, which is probably in the code, just disabled. No it cannot be compared to Age of Wulin or Age of Wushu.ĪoW was a Wuxia Sandbox MMORPG with freedom. The margin for error for both results is pretty low. R9 5950x single core performance score 3500 using the same synthetic load.Īccording to this website the I9 9900k has a single core performance of 219 whereas the R9 5950x has a single core performance of 277, again both tested with the same test, Cinebench R15.Įven if you argue that synthetic loads are not representative of real world conditions it still applies that both CPUs were tested using the same test and had thus the same conditions. I9 9900K single core performance score 2962 But it won't improve the games performance, especially when it's proven that the single core performance of certain players on this forum is already better than aves own CPU. If I'm a troll as much as you say then go ahead and report my posts. ![]() ![]() Just because I say things that you don't like and which are true at the same time doesn't make me a troll. Izeyash is a known troll, not your child, you don't have to feed them having played Age of Wulin I'd say the setting is probably similar, but I'd assume that the gameplay will feel different. ![]() If you take a bad engine and use a low singlecore performance cpu it wont make it any better and you will ofcourse get even worse performance, please start using common sense mr troll.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |